CMS Releases IDR Administrative Fee FAQ
Aug. 15, 2023 ||The administrative fee returns from $350 to $50 after an Aug. 3 court decision, but the independent dispute resolution portal remains closed to new disputes.
view more »The administrative fee returns from $350 to $50 after an Aug. 3 court decision, but the independent dispute resolution portal remains closed to new disputes.
view more »CMS suspended the independent dispute resolution process for certain surprise billing disputes due to an Aug. 3 court decision.
view more »The FAQ respond to concerns about the definition of cost sharing and facility fees in the No Surprises Act and Affordable Care Act.
view more »The decision comes after HHS halted payment determinations following a February court ruling vacating certain provisions of the No Surprises Act.
view more »HHS instructed federal independent dispute resolution entities not to issue new payment determinations in out-of-network billing payment disputes.
view more »The agency will not enforce a surprise billing requirement that requires good faith estimates to include cost estimates from co-providers and co-facilities.
view more »HHS seeks input on the No Surprises Act's advanced explanation of benefits and good faith estimate requirements for insured individuals; comments are due Nov. 15.
view more »The rule finalizes disclosure requirements for the qualifying payment amount and select provisions for the related independent dispute resolution process.
view more »The independent dispute resolution process can be initiated to resolve payment disputes between health care providers and issuers.
view more »Two new documents provide guidance for health care providers on No Surprises Act compliance and good faith estimates for uninsured or self-pay patients.
view more »The court ruled the qualifying payment amount should not be the main factor in determining payment for out-of-network services in independent dispute resolution.
view more »The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released guidance and example templates for good faith estimates and the surprise billing patient-provider dispute resolution process.
view more »New guidance from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reviews the timeline for open negotiations and initiating the federal independent dispute resolution process under the No Surprises Act.
view more »The new document explains various provisions under part II surprise billing regulations, including that all financial assistance should be reflected in the good faith estimate regardless of the amount or type of discount. The new regulations take effect Jan. 1, 2022.
view more »America’s Essential Hospitals commented on the second interim final rule implementing the No Surprises Act. The association urged HHS to revise good faith estimate requirements and create an IDR process that does not favor payers over providers.
view more »The departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Treasury, and Labor and the Office of Personnel Management issued Part II of the No Surprises Act interim final rule with comment period.
view more »In a letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, America's Essential Hospitals commented on the first interim final rule implementing the No Surprises Act. The association urged HHS to delay implementation until after the COVID-19 public health emergency, among other requests.
view more »The rule, released by the departments of Health and Human Services, the Treasury, and Labor and the Office of Personnel Management, bars health care insurers, carriers, and providers from billing patients more than in-network cost sharing amounts in certain circumstances.
view more »On July 1, the Biden administration released part 1 of the No Surprises Act interim final rule. Passed as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, the rule establishes new patient protections from balanced billing and excessive cost-sharing, known as surprise billing.
view more »The $2.3 trillion package to fund the government, provide new COVID-19 relief, and stimulate the economy would eliminate a $4 billion cut to Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments and add $3 billion to the Provider Relief Fund, among numerous other changes.
view more »The continuing resolution delays until Dec. 19 a scheduled $4 billion cut to Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments. Meanwhile, lawmakers introduce a new, two-part $908 billion legislative proposal for COVID-19 relief, as well as a deal on legislation regarding surprise medical bills.
view more »The Ways and Means legislation would preserve the ability of providers and health plans to negotiate payment rates through independent dispute resolution, while the Education and Labor plan would impose federal benchmark rates for charges of more than $750.
view more »Amid federal gridlock, 2019 was a prolific year for state-level policymaking on important issues for essential hospitals and their communities.
view more »In its bipartisan proposal on surprise medical bills, the House Committee on Ways and Means would preserve the ability of providers and health plans to negotiate the payment rate for out-of-network care. Also, the president releases his FY 2021 budget plan, including $920 billion in Medicaid cuts.
view more »The Consumer Protections Against Surprise Medical Bills Act of 2020 takes an important step toward a solution to surprise medical bills that protects patients and increases transparency without putting hospitals at a disadvantage in negotiations with insurers.
view more »Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Washington join dozens of other states already enforcing laws to shield patients from balance billing.
view more »